There was then no king in Edom: a deputy was king.
What Does I Kings 22:47 Mean?
Detailed meaning and commentary
"Administrative note regarding the absence of a king in Edom carries profound theological weight, signaling that the descendants of Esau were under the..."
articleRead Full Meaningarrow_forwardCompare Translations
There was then no king in Edom: a deputy was king.
And there was no king in Edom: a deputy was king.
There was then no king in Edom: a deputy was king.
There was then no king in Edom: a deputy was king.
At that time there was no king in Edom;
and there is no king in Edom; he set up a king.
There was no king in Edom: a deputy was king.
There was no king in Edom: a deputy was king.
There was no king in Edom: a deputy was king.
And there was no king in Edom: a deputy reigned.
[There was] then no king in Edom: a deputy [was] king.
There was then no King in Edom: the deputie was King.
And the remnant also of the effeminate, who remained in the days of Asa, his father, he took out of the land.
And, king, was there none in Edom, a prefect, was king.
No king was in Edom; a deputy was king.
There was then no king in Edom, a deputy was king.
There was then no king in Edom: a deputy was king.
There was not a king in Edom; a governor served as king.
And the remnant of the sodomites that remained in the days of his father Asa, he put away out of the land.
Then, too, the remnant of the effeminate, who had remained in the days of Asa, his father, he took away from the land.
And there was no king in Edom; a deputy served as king.
There was then no king in Edom: a deputy was king.
But also he took awey fro the loond the relikis of men turned in to wymmens condiciouns, that leften in the daies of Aza, his fadir.
