Now Sheshan had no sons, but daughters. And Sheshan had a servant, an Egyptian, whose name was Jarha.
What Does I Chronicles 2:34 Mean?
Detailed meaning and commentary
"Sheshan's lack of sons introduces a real genealogical tension, and Chronicles refuses to hide it. The line faces a visible limit, yet the text does no..."
articleRead Full Meaningarrow_forwardCompare Translations
Now Sheshan had no sons, but daughters. And Sheshan had a servant, an Egyptian, whose name was Jarha.
Now Sheshan had no sons, but daughters. And Sheshan had a servant, an Egyptian, whose name was Jarha.
Now Sheshan had no sons, but daughters. And Sheshan had a servant, an Egyptian, whose name was Jarha.
Now Sheshan had no sons, but daughters. And Sheshan had a servant, an Egyptian, whose name was Jarha.
Now Sheshan had no sons, but only daughters. And Sheshan had an Egyptian servant, whose name was Jarha.
And Sheshan had no sons, but daughters, and Sheshan hath a servant, an Egyptian, and his name is Jarha,
Now Sheshan had no sons, but daughters. Sheshan had a servant, an Egyptian, whose name was Jarha.
Now Sheshan had no sons, but daughters. Sheshan had a servant, an Egyptian, whose name was Jarha.
Now Sheshan had no sons, but daughters. Sheshan had a servant, an Egyptian, whose name was Jarha.
And Sheshan had no sons, but daughters; and Sheshan had an Egyptian servant, whose name was Jarha;
Now Sheshan had no sons, but daughters. And Sheshan had a servant, an Egyptian, whose name [was] Jarha.
And Sheshan had no sonnes, but daughters. And Sheshan had a seruant that was an Egyptian named Iarha.
And Sesan had no sons, but daughters and a servant an Egyptian, named Jeraa.
Now Sheshan had, no sons, but, daughters,—and, Sheshan, had a servant, an Egyptian, whose name was Jarha;
And Sheshan had no sons, but daughters. And Sheshan had an Egyptian servant, and his name was Jarha.
And Sheshan had no sons, but daughters. And Sheshan had a servant, an Egyptian, and his name was Jarha.
Now Sheshan had no sons, but daughters. And Sheshan had a servant, an Egyptian, whose name was Jarha.
And Sheshan had no sons, only daughters, but Sheshan had an Egyptian slave, and his name was Jarha.
Now Sheshan had no sons, but daughters. And Sheshan had a servant, an Egyptian, whose name was Jarha.
Now Sheshan did not have sons, but only daughters, and an Egyptian servant named Jarha.
Sheshan had no sons, but only daughters; but he did have an Egyptian servant named Jarha.
Now Sheshan had no sons, but daughters. And Sheshan had a servant, an Egyptian, whose name was Jarha.
Forsothe Sesan hadde not sones, but douytris, and a seruaunt of Egipt, Jeraa bi name;
